A conservative Christian legal group, Liberty Counsel, has filed a petition urging the United States Supreme Court to revisit the case of Kim Davis, a former Kentucky county clerk who declined to issue marriage licenses to same-sex couples on the grounds of her evangelical Christian faith, despite the fact there is no mention whatsoever in the Bible about same-sex relationships. Jesus never mentioned it once. This development marks yet another attempt to overturn the landmark 2015 Supreme Court ruling in Obergefell v. Hodges, which legalised same-sex marriage nationwide.
Kim Davis gained widespread attention in 2015 when she refused to comply with the Obergefell decision, resulting in a series of legal battles that led to her brief imprisonment and financial penalties including $100,000 in damages alongside additional legal fees. Liberty Counsel, which also operates as a Christian ministry, filed the petition on July 24, asserting that Davis’ case merits Supreme Court review as she was the first individual jailed for seeking religious accommodation in the wake of Obergefell. The group argues the decision infringes on religious freedoms protected by the First Amendment and calls for the Court to overturn it.
Legal experts remain skeptical about the likelihood of the Court taking up the case, noting the justices declined a similar appeal in 2020. Nevertheless, Liberty Counsel’s founder Mathew Staver highlighted growing dissatisfaction within the conservatively shifted Court, especially since Justice Amy Coney Barrett joined the bench and with Justice Clarence Thomas explicitly calling for the reconsideration of Obergefell. Thomas’ dissents, including in the 2022 Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization case which overturned Roe v. Wade, signal a judicial milieu more amenable to revisiting precedent on marriage equality.
Staver also pointed to the 2022 Respect for Marriage Act, which mandates that states recognise same-sex marriages performed elsewhere, as a factor that could lessen the practical impact of overturning Obergefell. He suggested this development removes a key objection previously cited by opponents of repealing the ruling and might encourage justices to reconsider the issue. However, LGBTQ+ advocates underline that even with this legislation, rescinding Obergefell would severely weaken LGBTQ+ rights and protections nationwide, with many religious communities across denominations continuing to support marriage equality.
The petition echoes a broader conservative push, with state legislatures in Idaho and other regions passing resolutions urging the Court to overrule Obergefell. Most notably, the Southern Baptist Convention recently adopted a resolution calling for the overturning of laws and court rulings, including Obergefell, that contradict their interpretation of marriage and family as ordained by God.
Liberty Counsel’s legal arguments focus on the constitutional implications of compelling public officials like Davis to act against their religious convictions in their official duties. The organisation positions Davis’ case as a test of whether First Amendment protections extend to government employees when personal beliefs conflict with their roles, hoping to establish a precedent that could limit the scope of Obergefell. Davis herself faces significant financial liabilities stemming from the original legal rulings against her, reinforcing the high stakes involved in this renewed legal effort.
Source: Noah Wire Services