An impassioned critique of the younger generation’s approach to identity within the LGBTQ+ community has surfaced in a post shared on Reddit, triggering a wave of discussion amongst users. The sentiments expressed by an older male contributor reflect a deep frustration with what he perceives as the re-emergence of social hierarchies and exclusivity that previous generations fought against.
In his post, the individual laments feeling “old” — not due to age, but because of the attitudes exhibited by some younger members of the LGBTQ+ community. He specifically denotes the valiant efforts of earlier activists who braved serious adversity including police violence, societal ostracism, and discrimination for the sake of achieving acceptance and diverse representation. Emphasising the struggles of past generations, he poignantly remarks, “You think your gay, bi and trans forefathers and grandmothers faced down police, skinheads, bombs in our pubs, hate preachers at our Pride marches… just so that you could set up a whole new set of fucking rules to judge each other by and tell other LGBT+ folk whether they were in or out?”
His comments point to a perceived fragmentation within the community, exemplified by terms like “masc vs femme,” “slut-shaming,” and discriminatory phrases such as “no blacks no Asians.” He dismisses the notion that such labels and distinctions contribute positively to the community, arguing instead for a more unified approach based solely on the shared experience of attraction to the same sex. The post underscores his belief that “the qualification for being gay is being sexually attracted to the same sex and not to the opposite sex. Nobody is more or less gay. Nobody is a better or worse gay.”
This reflection resonates with various commenters who engaged with the post, indicating a mix of agreement and contrasting perspectives on the state of the LGBTQ+ community today. Many supporters applauded the author for voicing concerns regarding the compartmentalisation they observe, while others offered a more optimistic view on identity expression within the community.
The discussion feed highlights a generational divide, as participants examine how far the LGBTQ+ movement has come, alongside the challenges that still exist. As society continues to evolve, the debate over inclusion, identity, and the meaning of acceptance within the community remains poignant and relevant.
Source: Noah Wire Services
- https://phys.org/news/2022-06-gen-zers-lgbtq-sacrifices-prior.html – This article supports the notion that younger generations, particularly Gen Z, are more open about their LGBTQ+ identities due to the sacrifices and efforts of previous generations. It highlights the generational differences in LGBTQ+ identity and acceptance.
- https://time.com/6275663/generation-z-gender-identity/ – This piece explores how Gen Z views gender identity, noting a more fluid understanding compared to older generations. It discusses the increased visibility and support for transgender and nonbinary identities among younger people.
- https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2020/10/28/generation-z-looks-a-lot-different-from-the-millennials/ – Although not directly addressing the Reddit post, this article provides context on the demographic and social shifts in Gen Z, which can influence their perspectives on identity and community.
- https://www.hrc.org/resources/survey-of-lgbtq-youth – This survey by the Human Rights Campaign offers insights into the experiences and perspectives of LGBTQ+ youth, which can inform discussions about identity and inclusivity within the community.
Noah Fact Check Pro
The draft above was created using the information available at the time the story first
emerged. We’ve since applied our fact-checking process to the final narrative, based on the criteria listed
below. The results are intended to help you assess the credibility of the piece and highlight any areas that may
warrant further investigation.
Freshness check
Score:
8
Notes:
The narrative does not reference specific outdated events or individuals who have changed roles, suggesting it is relatively current. However, the discussion topic is not time-sensitive and could be relevant at any point, which might indicate it could be a recycled or ongoing theme rather than breaking news.
Quotes check
Score:
9
Notes:
The quotes appear to be original to the Reddit post and do not seem to be copied from another source. Without a specific date or earlier reference online, it is assumed these are first-time quotes.
Source reliability
Score:
4
Notes:
The narrative originates from a lesser-known publication and references a Reddit post, which may not be as reliable as mainstream news sources. The lack of verification from authoritative sources reduces the reliability score.
Plausability check
Score:
8
Notes:
The claims about generational divides and identity issues within the LGBTQ+ community are plausible and align with ongoing discussions. However, specific examples like ‘no blacks no Asians’ might be anecdotal and lack broader evidence.
Overall assessment
Verdict (FAIL, OPEN, PASS): OPEN
Confidence (LOW, MEDIUM, HIGH): MEDIUM
Summary:
The narrative discusses a plausible and ongoing issue within the LGBTQ+ community but lacks strong verification from reliable sources. The quotes appear original, and the topic is not time-sensitive, which suggests it could be a current concern rather than recycled news.
TOP EVENTS
TOP EVENTS
