Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth [pic; Instagram] reignited a storm over religion and public office when he reposted a CNN segment that profiled Pastor Doug Wilson and other clergy who argued women should not be allowed to vote. The clip, which Hegseth shared on X with the caption ‘All of Christ for All of Life’, shows Wilson and affiliated pastors describing an explicitly Christian civic order and has prompted widespread criticism. According to reporting, Hegseth’s repost amplified views that many see as directly at odds with constitutional protections and long‑standing civil rights.
The segment itself lays out a systematic vision: Wilson tells viewers he aims first for Christian towns, then states, a nation and ultimately a Christian world, and insists these ends be sought ‘in a peaceful way’. Speaking in the CNN piece, Reverend Toby Sumpter described a model of ‘household voting’ in which a single family member would cast the ballot after consulting relatives, while other participants in the segment argued that women should be assigned the role of homemaker and mother rather than civic decision‑maker. Reporters noted some pastors even suggested dismantling the Nineteenth Amendment, which guaranteed women the vote in 1920.
Beyond the question of suffrage, the CNN profile and subsequent coverage highlighted other elements of Wilson’s worldview that have alarmed critics: advocacy to re‑criminalise consensual same‑sex relations, hostility to women in leadership or combat roles, and an educational and church network that promotes strict, male‑centred household authority. Critics have pointed to statements in which some ministers explicitly praised slaveholders or defended hierarchical racial and gender orders as evidence that the movement’s theology can translate into exclusionary public policy.
Religious and civic leaders responded swiftly. Doug Pagitt, pastor and leader of the progressive evangelical group Vote Common Good, described Hegseth’s amplification of Wilson’s views as ‘very troubling’, according to the Associated Press; others warned that a senior official giving oxygen to an agenda that would deny basic rights to women and LGBTQ+ people invited real institutional consequences. The Pentagon has confirmed Hegseth’s affiliation with a CREC‑linked church while officials offered limited comment on the broader implications of senior leaders hosting faith events during work hours.
Constitutional scholars and governance experts say the episode crystallises a recurring tension: how to protect individual religious liberty without allowing government power to be used to advance a particular sectarian creed. Observers emphasised that formal calls to repeal the Nineteenth Amendment or to re‑criminalise consensual sexual conduct would require major legislative and judicial shifts — but noted that the public visibility of such ideas from clergy with growing institutional reach raises questions about influence on policy and on institutions that serve a pluralistic population, including the armed forces. Military reporting also underscored the optics of government branding and official promotion of worship events.
The debate is likely to continue as journalists, legal experts and religious leaders parse what Hegseth’s repost signifies about the limits of personal faith for public officials and the boundaries of permissible speech and advocacy from the senior ranks of government. The original CNN profile remains the focal point for critics and defenders alike; its circulation by the Defence Secretary has transformed what some saw as a fringe theological argument into a matter of public policy scrutiny.
Source: Noah Wire Services
